-
周波:美国不可能组建“新全球联盟”应对中国的“战略挑战”
最后更新: 2020-12-08 07:24:23Why Joe Biden will struggle to rebuild the decaying transatlantic alliance to counter China
The countries which could not wait to congratulate Joe Biden on winning the presidency are America’s allies. This should be no surprise. In the past four years, Donald Trump’s “America first” policy and his alarming words to Nato have unnerved them all. They could only rejoice to embrace a man who said: “We’re going to be back in the game. It’s not America alone.”
According to the Financial Times, the European Union has recently drafted a plan to call on the United States to seize a “once-in-a-generation” opportunity to form a new global alliance, burying the tensions of the Trump era and meeting the “strategic challenge” presented by China.
This is probably easier said than done. The damage done to transatlantic ties is not a hairline crack that can be easily filled. Trump is the rare US president who called the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation “obsolete”, but he is certainly not the first one who fretted that Europe had been getting a free ride on the US security umbrella for too long.
The only difference is that his relentless ally-bashing, however unbecoming of a president, has worked. Now, eight Nato countries – compared to four by the end of the Obama administration – are meeting the target of spending 2 per cent of their gross domestic product on defence. It remains to be seen if a “good man” like Biden, as George W. Bush has called him, could do the same.
To some extent, the success of transatlantic relations rests on America’s willingness to give its allies a free ride. When the Soviet threat collapsed, Western solidarity started to fray. Although America and Europe still share some common goals, they are of a different order of urgency and seriousness. When it comes to American entrenchment, Europe is no longer a priority.
And the more the allies pay their dues, the quicker the US might shake off its responsibilities and withdraw from Europe.
There are only two scenarios in which the US-led alliance could be strengthened. The first involves American allies joining the US in confronting China – America’s primary competitor. But China is the largest trading partner of almost all the US’ European and Asian allies. Brussels and Washington can hardly bury the hatchet both between the transatlantic powers and within the European bloc when it comes to dealing with China.
For Washington’s allies in the Indo-Pacific, it is one thing to sing the American chant of “freedom of navigation”; it is quite another to take on the world’s second-largest economy. Take Australia, for instance. About a third of its total exports are destined for Chinese shores.
In the second scenario, China and Russia forge an alliance, triggering a new cold war. Beijing and Moscow are becoming ever closer, partly because both have been cast as Washington’s primary competitors. Therefore, any pressure from Washington on Moscow will only drive Russia closer to China, and the same goes for Beijing.
Not only do China and Russia conduct joint exercises on an annual basis, in recent years they have also launched anti-missile war games, and carried out a joint strategic air patrol.
Asked in October whether a military union between Moscow and Beijing was likely, Russian President Vladimir Putin replied that “we don’t need it, but, theoretically, it’s quite possible to imagine it”.
The value of a US-led alliance is more political than military. The primary objective of Nato, as indicated on its website, is to promote “democratic values”. But China has shown no intention to challenge any Western values.
China has made it clear that it won’t export its ideology or development model. Although China already has global influence, it is felt primarily in economic sectors. The People’s Liberation Army has increased its activities overseas, but these activities are so far restricted to humanitarian areas.
The challenge China poses to the West is not ideological; rather, it is psychological: how can an “authoritarian” state develop so quickly, perhaps even becoming the world’s largest economy one day? The short answer is: because China’s rise is from within.
As the largest beneficiary of globalisation and the market economy, China has no need to challenge the current international system. Beijing is only proving that not all roads necessarily lead to Rome, and that those with different development models and values can still succeed.
The problem with the West is that it has narcissistically equated the seven decades after World War II with “the liberal International order” and wants the order to continue. But there is no such order, even if most of the institutions and regimes were indeed designed and built by the West after the war.
It must be noted that major events such as the independence of more than 50 African countries, the rivalry between the United States and the former Soviet Union, and the rise of China, to name just a few, have also reshaped the international order since 1945. China’s and Russia’s veto power on the UN Security Council also matters in no small way to international security.
What appears to be a liberal international order, at best, really lasted 15 years or so: a fleeting period when the influence of the West was overwhelming, right after the dissolution of the Soviet Union and before China’s rise entered full swing.
When small nations hang together against a major external threat, it is perfectly understandable. But if the strongest nation on Earth feels a need to strengthen an alliance, it is rather baffling.
James Buchanan, the 15th American president, once said: “To avoid entangling alliances has been a maxim of our policy ever since the days of Washington, and its wisdom no one will attempt to dispute.” It is ironic to see how far America has gone in the opposite direction.
本文系观察者网独家稿件,文章内容纯属作者个人观点,不代表平台观点,未经授权,不得转载,否则将追究法律责任。关注观察者网微信guanchacn,每日阅读趣味文章。
-
本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑: 杨晗轶 
-
继续开庭,交叉询问第八位证人
2020-12-08 07:13 华为 -
美国新增18万例,累计1490万例
2020-12-08 07:02 新冠肺炎抗疫战 -
伊朗央行行长:美国不让我们买疫苗
2020-12-07 22:28 新冠肺炎抗疫战 -
马杜罗誓夺议会选举胜利:委内瑞拉将进入新时代
2020-12-07 20:39 拉美左翼 -
此时澳大利亚一算账:明年农产品出口额要下降7%
2020-12-07 19:55 观察者头条 -
他俩还在吵,“场面堪比拳击比赛”
2020-12-07 19:36 欧洲乱局 -
拜登选他当美国卫生部长,美媒:好意外
2020-12-07 18:52 美国政治 -
伊朗军方:人工智能锁定目标,枪口只对准他
2020-12-07 16:58 伊朗局势 -
拜登提名的国安顾问站澳大利亚,澳网民“嗨”了
2020-12-07 16:41 中国外交 -
美官员指责中方破坏环境,华春莹:自己先照照镜子
2020-12-07 16:20 -
美媒:美司法部长考虑在特朗普任内辞职
2020-12-07 16:18 美国政治 -
蓬佩奥又盯上了委内瑞拉选举,委外长回应亮了
2020-12-07 16:10 -
美方对中方统战部官员实施签证限制,外交部回应
2020-12-07 16:09 中美关系 -
眼灼、呕吐…印度暴“怪病”,数百人住院
2020-12-07 15:52 -
这些欧洲国家要搞“新冠免疫护照”?
2020-12-07 14:13 新冠肺炎抗疫战 -
澳政府机构敲警钟:中澳关系恶化将重创农产品出口
2020-12-07 13:56 -
王毅:中美应开启各层级对话,任何问题都可以谈
2020-12-07 13:30 中美关系 -
疫情追踪技术推出半年了,美国没什么人用...
2020-12-07 10:36 新冠肺炎抗疫战 -
刚被特朗普炒掉的官员,还不忘炒作中国“窃取疫苗”
2020-12-07 10:08 新冠肺炎抗疫战
相关推荐 -
哥大挺巴抗议持续,美众议长称国民警卫队应适时出动 评论 169安理会表决:俄方否决,中方反击美方指责 评论 275“6年增加两倍”,美军高官又炒:中国速度“惊人” 评论 139NASA局长抹黑中国登月,连专业常识都不顾了 评论 408最新闻 Hot
-
安理会上,俄美代表互相质问对方“为什么?”
-
周受资回应:我们哪儿都不会去
-
美官员:最近几周,美国已向乌克兰秘密提供远程导弹
-
“6年增加两倍”,美军高官又炒:中国速度“惊人”
-
“这泼天的富贵暂时轮不上美国”
-
“价格战太激烈,大众在华目标就是保住份额”
-
朔尔茨称“普京没资格”,俄方反怼
-
“以色列是种族隔离国家!”纽约爆发抗议,数百犹太人被捕
-
“宁德时代被美国施压还赚了,韩企投资美国怎么反而要亏?”
-
俄国防部副部长涉严重贪腐被拘
-
NASA局长抹黑中国登月,连专业常识都不顾了
-
特朗普迎接:我喜欢这人
-
欧洲急着减排,却发现实现目标得依赖中国
-
“中国报价太香,加税50%都吓不跑美国买家”
-
美太平洋舰队司令来华参会:2019年后来华最高级别军官
-
中国进口贴标“美国制造”,这家高端美企要被罚惨了
-