-
王绍光:改革开放、国家能力与经济发展(上)
关键字: 改革开放政治基础有效政府经济发展张夏准[1]王绍光:“奠基与延续:中国道路的世界性意义”,《东方学刊》创刊号(2018年9月),第1-7页。
[2]王绍光、胡鞍钢,《中国国家能力报告》(沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1993年);胡鞍钢、王绍光,《第二次转型:国家制度建设-(增订版)》(北京:清华大学出版社,2009年)。
[3] Eric Jones, TheEuropean Miracle: Environments, Economies and Geopolitics in the History ofEurope and Asia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).
[4]霍布斯(黎思复、黎廷弼译),《利维坦》(北京:商务印书馆,1985年),第99页。
[5]霍布斯,《利维坦》,第99-100页。
[6]亚当·斯密(陈福生、陈振骅译),《关于法律、警察、岁入及军备的演讲》(北京:商务印书馆,1962年),第232-233页。
[7] Adam Smith, TheWealth of Nations: An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth ofNations (Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1977), pp. 1227. 《国富论》中译本对这段话的翻译似乎不够准确。
[8] Istvan Hont, Politicsin Commercial Society: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Adam Smith (Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 2015, p. 113.
[9] John Brewer, TheSinews of Power: War, Money and the English State 1688-1783 (Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1989)
[10] Nicholas Henshall, The Myth of Absolutism: Change & Continuity in Early ModernEuropean Monarchy (London, Longman, 1992).
[11]李伯重,《火枪与账簿:早期经济全球化时代的中国与东亚世界》(北京:三联书店,2016年),第392页。
[12] Michael Roberts, The Military Revolution,1560-1660: Aninaugural lecture delivered before the Queen's University of Belfast (Belfast: M. Boyd, 1956).
[13] Geoffrey Parker, The Military Revolution: Military Innovation and the Rise of the West,1500-1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 3-4.
[14] Charles Tilly, Coercion,Capital and European States, AD 990 – 1990 (Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell,1992), p. 122.
[15] Ian Morris, TheMeasure of Civilization: How Social Development Decides the Fate of Nations(Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013), p. 173.
[16]欧阳泰Andrade, Tonio(陈信宏译),《1661,决战热兰遮:中国对西方的第一次胜利》(北京:九州出版社,2014年)
[17] Andrade, Tonio, The Gunpowder Age: China, Military Innovation, and the Rise of the Westin World History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016), pp.5-7.
[18]亚当·斯密(唐日松译),《国富论》(北京:华夏出版社,2005年),第五篇第一章。
[19] Sam Mitrani, The Rise of the Chicago Police Department:Class and Conflict, 1850-1894 (Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2013).
[20]高放,“近现代中国不平等条约的来龙去脉”,《南京社会科学》,1999年第2期。
[21] Adam Hochschild, King Leopold's Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in ColonialAfrica (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1999).
[22] William Howitt, Colonization and Christianity: A Popular History of the Treatment ofthe Natives by the Europeans in All Their Colonies (London: Longman, 1838),P. 9.
[23]马克思,《资本论》第一卷,《马克思恩格斯全集》第23卷(北京:人民出版社,1972年),第822页。
[24] Sven Beckert and Seth Rockman, eds., Slavery’s Capitalism: A New History ofAmerican Economic Development (Philadelphia: University of PennsylvaniaPress, 2016), p. 11.
[25] Paul Adams, Erick Langer, Lily Hwa, Peter Stearns,and Merry Wiesner-Hanks, ExperiencingWorld History (New York: NYU Press, 2000), p. 334.
[26]马克思,《资本论》第一卷,《马克思恩格斯全集》第23卷(北京:人民出版社,1972年),第828页。
[27]也就是说,英国废除奴隶制的主要原因不是出于人道主义,而是因为英属加勒比地区制糖业的衰落。Eric Eustace Williams, Capitalism & Slavery (Chapel Hill: The University of NorthCarolina Press, 1994).
[28] Selwyn H. H. Carrington, “Capitalism & Slaveryand Caribbean Historiography: An Evaluation,” Journal of African American History, Vol. 88, No. 3 (Summer,2003), pp. 304-312.
[29] Robin Blackburn, The Making of New World Slavery: From the Baroque to the Modern,1492-1800 (London: Verso, 1997), p. 572.
[30]转引自Sven Beckert and Seth Rockman, eds., Slavery’sCapitalism: A New History of American Economic Development (Philadelphia: Universityof Pennsylvania Press, 2016), p. 2.
[31] Sven Beckert and Seth Rockman, eds., Slavery’s Capitalism, p. 3.
[32] Sven Beckert and Seth Rockman, eds., Slavery’s Capitalism, p. 8.
[33]转引自马克思,《资本论》第一卷,《马克思恩格斯全集》第23卷(北京:人民出版社,1972年),第659页,注53.
[34]转引自George Modelski and William R. Thompson,Seapower in Global Politics, 1494–1993 (London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1988),p. 7. 在17世纪中期,雷利这种说法后来被约翰·伊夫林(John Evelyn, 1620-1706)抄袭、改造,流传得更广。
[35] Stephen R. Bown, Merchant Kings: When Companies Ruled the World, 1600—1900 (NewYork: Thomas Dunne Books, 2010), pp. 7-56.
[36] Thomas Papillon, The East-India-Trade A Most Profitable Trade to the Kingdom(London, 1696).
[37] Jeff Desjardins, “The Most Valuable Companies ofAll-Time,” http://www.visualcapitalist.com/most-valuable-companies-all-time/December 8, 2017,
[38]马克思,《资本论》第一卷,《马克思恩格斯全集》第23卷(北京:人民出版社,1972年),第822页。
[39]马克思,《资本论》第一卷,《马克思恩格斯全集》第23卷(北京:人民出版社,1972年),第820页。
[40]文一,《伟大的中国工业革命:“发展政治经济学”一般原理批判纲要》(北京:清华大学出版社,2016年),第七章第一节。
[41]文一,《伟大的中国工业革命:“发展政治经济学”一般原理批判纲要》(北京:清华大学出版社,2016年),第七章第一节。
[42] Robert F Hébert and Albert N. Link, A History of Entrepreneurship (Routledge,2009), p. 5.
[43] Robert F Hébert and Albert N. Link, A History of Entrepreneurship(Routledge, 2009), p. 5.
[44] Priya Satia, Empireof Guns: The Violent Making of the Industrial Revolution (New York: PenguinPress, 2018).
[45] Robin Blackburn, The Making of New World Slavery: From the Baroque to the Modern,1492-1800 (London: Verso, 1997), p. 573.
[46]马克思,《资本论》第一卷,《马克思恩格斯全集》第23卷(北京:人民出版社,1972年),第819页。
[47] Martin Wolfe, “Jean Bodin on Taxes: TheSovereignty-Taxes Paradox,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 83, No. 2 (Jun.,1968), pp. 268-284.
[48]转引自Rudolf Braun, “Taxation, Sociopolitical Structure, and State-building:Great Britain and Brandenburg-Prussia," in Charles Tilly (ed.), The Formation of National States in WesternEurope (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975), p. 243.
[49] Dudley Jackson, “Thomas Hobbes' Theory ofTaxation,” Political Studies, Vol.21, No. 2 (June 1973), pp. 175-182.
[50] Sir William Molesworth, ed., The English Works ofThomas Hobbes of Malmesbury (London, John Bohn, 1839-45), Vol. IV, p. 164.
[51] Sir William Molesworth, ed., The English Works ofThomas Hobbes of Malmesbury (London, John Bohn, 1839-45), Vol. II, p. 159.
[52] Sir William Molesworth, ed., The English Works ofThomas Hobbes of Malmesbury (London, John Bohn, 1839-45), Vol. III, pp. 333-334.
[53] Charles Tilly, Coercion,Capital and European States, AD 990 – 1990 (Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell,1992), pp. 74, 76, 82-83.
[54] Jan de Vries and Ad van der Woude, The First Modern Economy. Success, Failure,and Perseverance of the Dutch Economy, 1500–1815 (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity, 1997).
[55]欧洲各国税收历史数据库,https://ata.boun.edu.tr/sites/ata.boun.edu.tr/files/faculty/sevket.pamuk/database/a-_web_sitesi.xls
[56] Mark Dincecco, “The Rise of Effective States inEurope,” The Journal of Economic History,Vol. 75, No. 3 (September 2015). pp. 907-908.
[57] Peer Vries, “Public finance in China and Britainin the long eighteenth century,” LSE Working Papers No. 167/12, 2012, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/45563/1/WP167.pdfpp. 18-19.
[58] Peer Vries, State, Economy and the GreatDivergence: Great Britain and China, 1680s-1850s (London: Bloomsbury Academic,2015), pp. 94-98. 又见S. A. M. Adshead, China in WorldHistory (London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2000), pp. 245-247.
[59] Mark Dincecco, “The Rise of Effective States inEurope,” The Journal of Economic History,Vol. 75, No. 3 (September 2015), pp. 901-918.
[60] Patrick O'Brien, “The nature and historicalevolution of an exceptional fiscal state and its possible significance for theprecocious commercialization and industrialization of the British economy fromCromwell to Nelson,” The Economic HistoryReview, Vol. 64, No. 2 (2011), pp. 408-446.
[61] Mauricio Drelichman, Hans-Joachim Voth, Lending to the Borrower from Hell: Debt,Taxes, and Default in the Age of Philip II (Princeton: NJ: PrincetonUniversity Press, 2014).
[62] Jan Luiten van Zanden and Arthur van Riel, The Strictures of Inheritance: The DutchEconomy in the Nineteenth Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton UniversityPress, 2004).
[63] Peer Vries, State,Economy and the Great Divergence: Great Britain and China, 1680s-1850s(London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015), pp. 94-98.
[64]孙隆基,“中国在近代全球经济中的角色”,2015年12月21日,http://www2.scut.edu.cn/economy/2015/1221/c1805a31351/page.htm
[65] Ha-Joon Chang, Kicking Away the Ladder:Development Strategy in Historical Perspective (Anthem Press, 2002). 这本书的中译本书名为《富国陷阱:发达国家为何踢开梯子?》(北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009年)。
[66]张夏淮另一本书的中译本题为《富国的伪善:自由贸易的迷思与资本主义秘史》(北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008年)。
- 原标题:王绍光:改革开放、国家能力与经济发展(上) 本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑:武守哲
- 最后更新: 2018-11-06 07:10:15
-
如何构建中国话语?它的创刊开了一个好头
2018-10-31 15:40 -
华盛顿邮报网站刊登李世默文章:如何理解中国修宪?
2018-04-03 16:07 中国模式 -
7家中国智库上榜全球顶级智库百强
2018-02-14 14:02 中国超越 -
“一带一路”智库合作联盟理事会第三次会议在京举行
2017-02-24 11:04 -
中国智库透明度报告发布
2017-01-09 15:53 -
“一带一路网”开网仪式在京举行
2017-01-09 15:53 -
《人民币为什么行》书籍在京发布
2017-01-09 15:53 -
《中国智库国际影响力研究报告》在京发布
2017-01-09 15:53 -
神预测!阎学通三年前准确描绘英国脱欧
2016-06-28 08:50 不列颠 -
【预告】6月8日 周晓晶讲座:全球经济走出金融危机冲击后十年萧条的思考
2016-06-07 09:29 中国梦 -
供给侧结构性改革青年研讨会五四在京举办
2016-05-04 17:33 中国梦 -
新型智库崛起,十位青年新锐打擂台 共议供给侧结构性改革
2016-05-04 16:51 中国梦 -
缅甸现在一团和气,但是……
2016-03-18 08:35 缅甸局势 -
什么是幸福?刘建军教授谈居民社区的“温度”
2016-03-08 07:35 基层治理 -
一带一路规划起草人:中企走出去不能吃独食
2016-02-24 15:15 一带一路 -
“一带一路”国际智库合作联盟启动
2016-02-23 15:04 一带一路
相关推荐 -
荷兰“拼了”:阿斯麦,别走! 评论 81“嫌犯从乌克兰获大量资金和加密货币,有确凿数据” 评论 312美方对俄隐瞒了部分信息?克宫回应 评论 109国防部表态:中方不会在南海问题上任菲胡来 评论 192最新闻 Hot
-
荷兰“拼了”:阿斯麦,别走!
-
“我们美国人说要做的事,中国人已经做到了”
-
“嫌犯从乌克兰获大量资金和加密货币,有确凿数据”
-
“美正拟中国先进芯片企业黑名单”,驻美大使馆回应
-
“要三思啊,这种民族主义口号将毁掉国家”
-
“如果TikTok被禁,美科技巨头也应该被调查”
-
美方对俄隐瞒了部分信息?克宫回应
-
美主持人问了大家想问不敢问的问题,白宫“震怒”
-
法国叫停安理会会议,扎哈罗娃怒斥:做贼心虚
-
中国在全球率先商用5.5G,首批百城名单公布
-
这条中马“一带一路”重点铁路项目 “或延伸至泰国”
-
印度强烈抗议美国:民主国家不能这样
-
联合国再警告:英国这事令人担忧
-
“俄罗斯恢复死刑,没啥戏”
-
银河系中心超大质量黑洞,又一张偏振图像来了
-
竟还有这样给他们洗白的:“善良有爱心”、“胆小不敢杀鸡”…
-