-
罗思义:“民主峰会”是一场地缘政治攻击,但中国不用担心
最后更新: 2021-12-09 09:32:55“Democracy” means the people rule – what are the practical implications of this?
The word democracy in European languages, derives from two Greek words “demos (people)” and “kratos (rule)”. So, “democracy” means literally “rule by the people”.
Democracy is presented as integrally linked to human rights, that is “people’s rights”. This is correct and will be used here. This reality shows that China’s framework and delivery on human rights and democracy is far superior to the “West’s”.
But, contrary to this fundamental concept of “rule by the people” an attempt is made in the West, more accurately by capitalist countries, to claim that democracy is instead defined purely in terms of certain formal and official structures which they possess – for example Parliament, so called “division of powers” etc. This is false. The issue of democracy is about how much in reality “rule by the people” exists.
The position of women in China and India shows the fake US definition of human rights
To illustrate the real issues involved in the issue of human rights and democracy let us start with an enormous practical example affecting almost one fifth of humanity – women’s position in China and India.
An Indian woman’s life expectancy is 71, in China it is 79.2 – a Chinese woman lives 8 years longer than an Indian woman.
In China female literacy is 95%, in India it is 65%.
The risk of a woman dying in childbirth is 8 times higher in India than in China.
In the real world, for the thinking of any normal human being, the real human rights of a Chinese woman are therefore far superior to those of an Indian woman (I say this with no pleasure at all, I would like the human rights of an Indian woman to improve to become the equal of those of a Chinese woman).
Yet according to the US concept of “democracy” the ridiculous claim is made that the rights of an Indian woman are superior to those of a Chinese woman – because an Indian woman lives in a “Parliamentary Republic”. What concept leads to such an obviously ridiculous conclusion?
Or take Covid. Less than 5,000 people in Mainland China have died from Covid. In the US 778,000 people have died from Covid. But China’s population is more than four times that of the US. If the same number of people per capita had died in China as in the US there would be 3,390,000 Chinese people dead instead of less than 5,000. But the US claims human rights and democracy are better in the US than China! What type of absurd reasoning can try to justify such a conclusion which in violation of all the facts on the most fundamental issues of life and death?
Marx became a socialist through analysis of the errors of liberalism
The issues involved in this, go right back to the origins of socialism – which was developed precisely as a critique of the theory and limits of liberal/parliamentary democracy.
The work in which Marx became a socialist, making his transition from a liberal democrat, is his Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right of 1843. Marx showed that the real role of the state was to defend the existing property relations – at that time in Germany these were approaching capitalist relations. This analysis has been fully factually confirmed by innumerable practical examples since that time. Every time that an attempt has been made on a peaceful basis to make the transition from capitalism to socialism, or even to come close to this, the capitalist state has intervened not in order to allow this transition to take place on democratic principles but, on the contrary, to overthrow democracy in order to preserve capitalism. The most infamous example of this internationally was the coup d’etat against Salvador Allende in Chile in 1973 but numerous other examples could be given – for example the Guatemala (1954), Brazil (1964), Honduras (2009), Bolivia (2019).
Having analysed the material role of the capitalist state then, the next year, Marx in his work On the Jewish Question, gave his classic analysis of the false ideology of the “liberal democratic” capitalist state. Marx demonstrated, via analysis of the position of Jews in Germany, the difference between the “official” and “formal” claims of liberal/parliamentary democracy and reality. He demonstrated that removal of formal and legal restrictions on Jews in Germany did not lead to their real equality. It is this analysis which directly relates to the difference between the real human rights of Chinese women and Indian women already considered - although Marx, dealing with an urgent political issue of his period, analysed it regarding the position of Jews in Germany.
Marx designated the difference between what he termed “political emancipation” and “human emancipation” – between purely formal equality and rights in politics and the fundamental inequality and lack of rights in the real world. This so classically sets out the reality of Western parliamentary democracy that it is worth quoting in detail – any other words would simply summarise an analysis that could not be put more clearly.
Marx put it regarding the difference between formal and real human freedom, and the real “rule of the people” that in parliamentary/liberal democracy: “man liberates himself from a restriction… in an abstract and restricted manner”. This is while liberal/parliamentary democracy proclaimed “equality” this was a fiction in the real world in which human beings lived.
Marx put it regarding the purely formal statements of capitalist/parliamentary democracy: “The state abolishes, in its own way, distinctions of birth, social rank, education, occupation, when it declares that birth, social rank, education, occupation, are non-political distinctions, when it proclaims, without regard to these distinction, that every member of the nation is an equal participant in national sovereignty.” But in reality, none of these real distinctions was removed: “Nevertheless, the state allows private property, education, occupation, to act in their way – i.e., as private property, as education, as occupation, and to exert the influence of their special nature. Far from abolishing these real distinctions, the state only exists on the presupposition of their existence.”
Marx’s analysis of the difference between the real position of Jews in Germany and the false claims of liberal democracy
Therefore, Marx showed there was a complete distinction between the myths of liberal democracy and the reality of human beings life: In a classic passage, going to the core of the myths of liberal democracy: “Where the political state has attained its true development, man – not only in thought, in consciousness, but in reality, in life – leads a twofold life, a heavenly and an earthly life: life in the political community, in which he considers himself a communal being, and life in civil society”.
He went on: “The relation of the political state to civil society is just as spiritual as the relations of heaven to earth. The political state stands in the same opposition to civil society… in the same way as religion prevails over… the secular world… In his most immediate reality, in civil society, man is a secular being…. In the state, on the other hand… he is the imaginary member of an illusory sovereignty, is deprived of his real individual life and endowed with an unreal universality.”
Marx showed that there was a move towards a purely formal equality of Jews in German society, but this concealed the real existing inequality. Liberal/parliamentary democracy obscured this reality by defining “equality” and “democracy” in only a narrow artificial and formal way while ignoring the real inequalities, and the discriminations, that existed.
This situation, and Marx’s analysis of it, later, of course, culminated in one of the greatest crimes in human history - the development of German antisemitism into the Nazi holocaust.
This analysis of the position of the Jews in Germany provided a model for the analysis of the real situation in capitalism. It is exactly this which is shown by the difference of the position of women in China and India, or the difference in deaths from Covid.
The claim by Western capitalist theory is that women in India enjoy better human rights than women in China because of the existence of Parliamentary democracy. This precisely shows the difference between what Marx termed the “heavenly” rights, that is non-existent ones, and “earthly life” – the real one.
Obviously, the real human rights of a Chinese woman are far superior to those of an Indian woman – that is her real “earthly life”. But the theory of liberal democracy ridiculously claims that the human rights of an Indian woman are superior to those of a Chinese woman because of her “heavenly life” in a purely formal equality in Parliamentary Democracy – an equality which in reality does not exist.
-
本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑: 戴苏越 
-
升破6.35关口,人民币汇率创三年半新高
2021-12-09 08:46 观网财经-金融 -
宁波上海广州等港口提价,海运费“高烧”或延续两三年
2021-12-09 07:23 观网财经-宏观 -
蜜雪冰城起诉抖音网络侵权
2021-12-08 19:38 -
二次上市首日破发,缺少新故事的微博出路在哪
2021-12-08 19:34 观网财经-互联网 -
王毅接待多国外长,为何选在湖州?
2021-12-08 16:38 绿水青山就是金山银山 -
美国安顾问扬言阻止“武统”,中方回应
2021-12-08 16:22 -
《金融时报》说中国危险,但全球投资者用脚投票
2021-12-08 15:41 观网财经-宏观 -
“圣诞节前噩梦”,iPhone十年来首次停产
2021-12-08 15:14 观网财经-科创 -
央视网:文峰“彩虹屁”现象易演化为职场PUA
2021-12-08 10:03 观网财经-评论 -
卖出点成买入,亿纬锂能实控人减持时真的“误操作”?
2021-12-08 09:50 观网财经-科创 -
政治局会议首提“促进房地产业健康发展和良性循环”,如何实现?
2021-12-08 09:29 观网财经-房产 -
研究:“伟哥”或可防治阿尔茨海默病
2021-12-08 09:24 观网财经-健康 -
经济日报:即便面对经济下行压力,“房住不炒”也没有动摇
2021-12-08 09:07 观网财经-房产 -
韩国最大规模IPO!宁德时代劲敌LG新能源拟募资百亿美元
2021-12-08 08:42 观网财经-金融 -
面签3天后放款,楼市调控有新动向?
2021-12-08 08:15 观网财经-房产 -
“美国不需要拜登政府的1.7万亿美元法案”
2021-12-07 22:51 -
无需供体角膜,人工角膜产品获批上市
2021-12-07 21:30 医学 -
“中国经济增长不仅有利于中国,也有利于世界”
2021-12-07 20:28 观网财经-宏观 -
网传裁员30%,快手外战内战双双不利
2021-12-07 20:19 -
8核芯片变4核,欧拉能否用“7200元权益包”挽回信任?
2021-12-07 20:16 观网财经-汽车
相关推荐 -
伊朗外长否认以空袭:除非遭重大袭击,否则不予回应 评论 120重庆通报“燃气费异常”:燃气集团党委书记被免职 评论 670“伊以都在降调”,国对国直接打击结束? 评论 143以色列“有限复仇”:选在了伊朗核计划中心 评论 357以色列“报复”开始:伊朗多地传出爆炸声 评论 591最新闻 Hot
-
“伊以都在降调”,国对国直接打击结束?
-
美方挑事:中国做出贡献,威胁全欧洲
-
印度大选开锣,莫迪稳赢了?
-
俄气真香?欧盟机构警告:一时断不了
-
“德国车是世界上最好的,不必害怕中国,但…”
-
抛弃自家兄弟,肯尼迪家族15人支持拜登
-
“拜登考虑再援以10亿美元武器”
-
日教材称“殖民推动韩国近代化”,韩外交部召见日大使抗议
-
重庆通报“燃气费异常”:燃气集团党委书记被免职
-
G7竟威胁中国:跟俄罗斯走近,与西方就远
-
以色列“有限复仇”:选在了伊朗核计划中心
-
5.3%,一季度“开门红”能转化为“全年红”吗?
-
两大家族开撕?菲第一夫人公开指责副总统:不道歉,这事就没完
-
美国一票否决,多方回应
-
李迅雷:发展服务业与做强制造业不矛盾,可参照德国、日本
-
欧盟跟着泼脏水:中国不仅坐山观虎斗,还下场了
-