-
周波:中国可以发挥对俄独特影响力,防止欧洲发生核冲突
最后更新: 2022-11-01 07:34:58英文原文:
Zhou Bo: China can use its leverage with Russia to prevent a nuclear war
Will Putin use nuclear weapons in Ukraine? This billion-dollar question matters not only to Kyiv and Europe, but also to China. So far Beijing has trodden a careful line between Russia, its strategic partner, and Ukraine, which is a significant trading partner. During September’s Samarkand summit, Vladimir Putin thanked China for its “balanced position” on the Ukraine conflict.
But if Moscow decides to use tactical nuclear weapons against Ukraine, China can hardly maintain such a position anymore. A joint declaration between Beijing and Kyiv in December 2013 agreed that China will not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine and, more importantly, will provide security assurances in the event of any such threat by a third party.
Putin’s intensifying rhetoric is therefore raising the stakes for Beijing. He said last month he would be ready to defend the “territorial integrity” of Russia “by all means.” If his military is struggling on the battlefield — which it is in areas such as Kharkiv, where Ukrainian forces are retaking lost territory — then the likelihood of Russia deploying tactical nuclear missiles only increases.
China has so far refrained from providing any military assistance to Russia. But given Beijing’s huge influence on Moscow, it is uniquely positioned to do more to prevent a nuclear conflict.
First, Beijing should tell Moscow to honour the five nuclear powers’ joint statement in January that “nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought”. Russia has the largest nuclear arsenal in the world and threatening Ukraine — which chose to give up its nuclear weapons — has already tarnished its reputation. It would be all the more appalling if Putin followed through on his threat against Ukrainian citizens, who he had previously described as “practically one people” with Russians.
Second, Beijing should make clear to the Kremlin that using nuclear weapons on the battlefield would put China in a very difficult situation. Beijing has maintained a policy of “no first use” of nuclear weapons for more than half a century. While other defence policies have changed, this has held firm and China prides itself on having nuclear strategies which are the most stable, sustainable and predictable among nuclear powers.
The last thing Beijing wants now is a sour relationship with European capitals. At a time when the US is ramping up its competition with China, it is particularly important that Europe does not always take America’s side. Putin has admitted that Beijing had “questions and concerns” about Russia’s invasion — but if he uses nuclear weapons, then Beijing’s response will go far beyond questions and concerns. Could China remain neutral in the event of international protests against Moscow? And could Beijing abstain from a UN Security Council vote condemning Russia for its actions?
Finally, Beijing could play a significant role in brokering a deal between Russia and Nato. For example, Nato could promise to halt any further expansion in exchange for Moscow agreeing not to use nuclear weapons. Such a compromise would save face on both sides. During the 1962 Cuban missile crisis, US President John F. Kennedy and Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev reached a similar agreement: the Soviets would dismantle their ballistic missiles in Cuba in exchange for a US pledge not to invade Cuba again. Secretly, America also agreed to dismantle all of the Jupiter medium-range ballistic missiles which had been stationed in Turkey for possible use against Russia.
Since Moscow’s primary concern has been Nato expansion, Putin might find this option worth considering. It would be worth thinking about for Nato too. The alliance’s expansion in the face of the Kremlin’s warnings has helped push Europe to the brink of a nuclear conflict. Putin is right to conclude this is a war between Russia and the west rather than between Russia and Ukraine. As a goodwill gesture, Nato could pledge not to use nuclear weapons first against Russia or within Moscow’s sphere of influence.
In a 2018 documentary, Putin asked, “Why do we need a world without Russia in it?” The answer should be, “But where is Russia without the world?” If Putin now opens a nuclear Pandora’s box that was kept closed even during the cold war, it would be a moment of infinite stupidity. China can help the world by simply telling Putin: don’t use nuclear weapons, Mr President.
本文系观察者网独家稿件,文章内容纯属作者个人观点,不代表平台观点,未经授权,不得转载,否则将追究法律责任。关注观察者网微信guanchacn,每日阅读趣味文章。
-
本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑: 戴苏越 
-
美国新增感染39210例、死亡82例
2022-11-01 07:04 抗疫进行时 -
伊朗宣布对美军将领、CIA等个人与实体施加制裁
2022-11-01 06:56 伊朗局势 -
普京:俄气获准参与“北溪”事件调查
2022-11-01 06:48 俄罗斯之声 -
三舱组合!梦天实验舱与空间站组合体太空会师
2022-11-01 06:45 航空航天 -
印度警方逮捕9人,涉事大桥维修商主营挂钟
2022-10-31 23:20 印度惊奇 -
习近平向越共中央总书记阮富仲授予“友谊勋章”并举行隆重颁授仪式
2022-10-31 23:09 -
马朝旭会见俄新任驻华大使莫尔古洛夫
2022-10-31 23:03 中俄关系 -
为拥护跨性别活动,美国学生吃《圣经》…
2022-10-31 22:12 -
“他们故意晃桥,工作人员也不管”
2022-10-31 22:11 -
拉夫罗夫:俄中纽带是国际关系民主化的关键
2022-10-31 21:13 俄罗斯之声 -
李克强将于11月8日至11日访问柬埔寨?外交部回应
2022-10-31 21:07 -
贝卢斯科尼:不给武器只给重建资金,乌克兰或许会回到谈判桌
2022-10-31 19:34 乌克兰之殇 -
驻韩大使邢海明吊唁梨泰院踩踏事故遇难者
2022-10-31 19:34 三八线之南 -
中国驻釜山总领事馆为梨泰院踩踏事故遇难者降半旗志哀
2022-10-31 19:30 三八线之南 -
习近平同越共中央总书记阮富仲举行会谈
2022-10-31 19:19 观察者头条 -
“这是总统该在事故现场说出来的话吗?”
2022-10-31 19:05 -
“目前为止,他还没发声承认败选”
2022-10-31 19:03 -
不满毒贩被执行死刑,英富豪却拒绝新加坡“不服来辩”邀请
2022-10-31 18:13 -
有人故意推搡致踩踏?韩国警方回应
2022-10-31 17:33 三八线之南 -
习近平即将为越共中央总书记阮富仲颁授“友谊勋章”
2022-10-31 17:31 中国外交
相关推荐 -
重庆通报“燃气费异常”:燃气集团党委书记被免职 评论 396“伊以都在降调”,国对国直接打击结束? 评论 112以色列“有限复仇”:选在了伊朗核计划中心 评论 356以色列“报复”开始:伊朗多地传出爆炸声 评论 5895.3%,一季度“开门红”能转化为“全年红”吗? 评论 158最新闻 Hot
-
以色列“有限复仇”:选在了伊朗核计划中心
-
5.3%,一季度“开门红”能转化为“全年红”吗?
-
两大家族开撕?菲第一夫人公开指责副总统:不道歉,这事就没完
-
美国一票否决,多方回应
-
李迅雷:发展服务业与做强制造业不矛盾,可参照德国、日本
-
欧盟跟着泼脏水:中国不仅坐山观虎斗,还下场了
-
美国积极促成沙以和好,“可以限制中国”
-
“这是拜登政府首次挑起加税,中方反制不会手软”
-
“预计今年将推出一揽子政策,旨在解决问题而非刺激经济”
-
美以私下做了个交易?美方紧急撇清
-
特朗普变口风:乌克兰的存亡对美国很重要,欧洲麻利点
-
“未来几年,这是各方关注中国市场的一个重要指标”
-
应韩企要求,美国拟恢复一项涉华关税
-
菲律宾“倒打一耙”
-
“以色列精心策划俩月,但严重低估了伊朗反应”
-
“你们愿意中国提前登月?不愿意?那就打钱”
-