-
汤姆·福迪:甘当美国傀儡、挑起对华冷战,对英国没好处
Britain's Pursuit of Cold War is Dangerous
Last week British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss pursued a highly provocative speech at a London event where she took aim at both Russia and China. The speech was typical of Liz, in that it sought to frame global politics as a zero-sum ideological struggle between democracy and authoritarianism, of which she likes to describe as a “network of liberty”. Yet, it went further than previous addresses that it was intentionally more aggressive and sought to demand that China “play by the rules” stating that its rise was “not inevitable”, with Truss also vowing to involve the UK and NATO in the Taiwan region. Arguably, it is the most single aggressive address ever given by a British foreign secretary concerning Beijing.
British Foreign Policy since Brexit has been premised on an effective delusion, that is the nostalgia of a long-gone era whereby “Britannia ruled the waves” and wielded the power of a global empire of which allowed it to impose its will on others. China of course is no stranger to that legacy. With the opium wars, Britain opened what Chinese people understand as the “century of humiliation” when European powers learnt they could use their growing military might to force political and economic concessions on a declining Qing Dynasty. Liz Truss clearly believes that London is capable of doing the same thing to China again, and is hungry for confrontation with Beijing.
But none of this fiery rhetoric has any basis in reality. The world has changed, and circumstances are no longer favourable for the UK. Britain’s withdrawal from the European Union was a self-inflicted wound which has had a huge detrimental impact on the economy across the board. It has created supply shortages, labour shortages, added to burgeoning in inflation and severely hurt services too. This has coupled with surging energy prices and shrinking standards of living. The truth is that in lieu of Brexit, Britain’s economic relationship with China is of critical importance and Boris Johnson had long understood this and made it clear. The United Kingdom cannot afford to distance itself from the largest consumer market and trading nation on Earth.
However, the Prime Minister is increasingly struggle for influence with these ultra-hawks within the Conservative Party who are attempting to mould Brexit into a broader ideological and civilizational struggle in the name of Anglophone exceptionalism. These people, such as Liz Truss, do not base Britain’s economic and trade interests on empirical realities see it also as an extension of identity politics and Imperial nostalgia. They argue that Britain should be primarily trading with the nations of the Anglosphere (Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States) as well as of course India, which Britain also heralds a post-colonial nostalgia towards, and not of course on the actual merits of what these countries can contribute to Britain.
For example, according to House of Commons Research, Britain’s “free trade agreement” with Australia will only increase GDP by 0.08% per annum (which also has been widely criticized for undermining British agriculture), illustrating the bizarre decision making of the British government premising trade on identity and economic reality. Whereas China, which has a bilateral trade with Britain in terms of £100 billion per annum, is seemingly off limits. If it wasn’t clear already, post-Brexit Britain is harbouring a foreign policy which is based purely on nationalistic sentiment and Imperial good feeling, and as a result has no coherent grasp of the country’s strategic realities or national interest, leading to self-destructive decision making. As an old saying goes: “the lunatics are in charge of the Asylum”.
Despite the deep interdependence and mutual self-interest of the British-China relationship, there is nothing that could be more offensive to the Chinese people themselves to a Britain roleplaying its Imperial past and believing that it has the right to bring China to keel, there is a political will in Beijing that history won’t be allowed to repeat itself. China is the 2nd largest economy in the world with a GDP estimated over $17 trillion, whilst the UK is a stagnating country whose future prosperity will hinge upon access to its markets. If Britain is to be truly “global” as its government markets its to be, then the sensible choice is to step back from the brink, regain control of its foreign policy from the United States, and engage with China on pragmatic, realistic and independent terms. Fanatical Cold War chauvinism will undermine decades worth of progress.
本文系观察者网独家稿件,文章内容纯属作者个人观点,不代表平台观点,未经授权,不得转载,否则将追究法律责任。关注观察者网微信guanchacn,每日阅读趣味文章。
-
本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑: 谌海滨 
-
首位非裔女性出任白宫发言人
2022-05-06 07:26 美国政治 -
“中国人民不会忘记这一野蛮暴行,也绝不允许这样的历史重演”
2022-05-06 07:14 乌克兰之殇 -
联合国安理会审议乌克兰问题,俄乌代表各执一词
2022-05-06 07:09 乌克兰之殇 -
乌官员:乌军或将在6月底至7月初反攻
2022-05-06 06:56 乌克兰之殇 -
乌波签署关于支持安全与国防的文件
2022-05-06 06:48 乌克兰之殇 -
美国防部否认“协助乌克兰击杀几名俄罗斯将军”
2022-05-06 06:41 乌克兰之殇 -
哈萨克斯坦将于6月5日举行宪法修正案全民公投
2022-05-05 23:26 -
美媒新角度:中国人吃太多人造肉也不行,会影响肉类出口国GDP…
2022-05-05 23:19 -
“钢铁厂内乌军想拿平民换食物,这堪比恐怖分子”
2022-05-05 23:02 乌克兰之殇 -
俄军攻入亚速钢铁厂?克宫否认:普京未下达新命令
2022-05-05 22:52 俄罗斯之声 -
世卫:全球新冠死亡人数约1500万,为官方通报数据三倍
2022-05-05 22:25 抗疫进行时 -
俄新社:在乌军指挥部发现了“黑魔法”神秘符号
2022-05-05 20:46 -
日本首相访英,将允许两国军队共同部署
2022-05-05 19:46 不列颠 -
被教皇警告勿成“普京的祭坛辅祭”后,他又被欧盟盯上
2022-05-05 18:44 俄罗斯之声 -
美官员:美方情报助乌军击杀多名俄军将领
2022-05-05 17:14 美国政治 -
美英首次探讨台海冲突应急计划,外交部回应
2022-05-05 17:09 中国外交 -
88家中企被列入美国证交所名单,外交部回应
2022-05-05 16:45 中美关系 -
外交部:中韩正就派代表参加韩国新总统就职仪式保持沟通
2022-05-05 16:40 三八线之南 -
外交部:原住民问题是美国的原罪
2022-05-05 16:37 美国一梦 -
立刻跟随欧盟禁俄油?日本:难
2022-05-05 15:54 日本
相关推荐 -
美方对俄隐瞒了部分信息?克宫回应 评论 23国防部表态:中方不会在南海问题上任菲胡来 评论 161关于ASML出口管制,荷兰首相在华表态 评论 463警惕!“隐秘”的调查暗藏国家安全风险 评论 127最新闻 Hot
-
银河系中心超大质量黑洞,又一张偏振图像来了
-
竟还有这样给他们洗白的:“善良有爱心”、“胆小不敢杀鸡”…
-
“港独分子”作证:他勾结外国反华政客!
-
这个数据,孟买首次超越北京
-
浙大社会学系第3次更新:赵鼎新再度“荣休”
-
美国务院一官员辞职:自焚军人最后的留言让我难以忘怀
-
日本资助的项目被搁置,斯里兰卡:中国承诺帮我们
-
关于ASML出口管制,荷兰首相在华表态
-
耶伦:我要当面“警告”中国,你们东西太便宜,搞得美国企业破产
-
警惕!“隐秘”的调查暗藏国家安全风险
-
普京反问:我们跨越大洋跑到美国边境了吗?
-
“美国暴露了”
-
“为何总觉得你们的生活方式比我们好?甚至连提问方式都…”
-
中企被迫退出竞标,“欧盟借这招威慑外企”
-
他威胁“不停火就断交”,以色列怒了
-
美媒“拆台”:哪有火车?你咋坐的?
-