-
马凯硕:如果世界各国学习美国民主,那问题就大了
最后更新: 2021-12-06 18:01:36Kishore Mahbubani:
I want to first begin by thanking Vice Minister Le for his very warm words and welcome. It's very good to meet virtually even though we cannot meet physically. I’m also very happy to be connected with my friends, Eric Li, Zhang Weiwei, Martin Jacques across this virtual realm, it's good to see you all. And I’m glad you cited Mr. Lee Kuan Yew in your remarks, because, in a sense, I’m going to build on what you just quoted from him. When he said, “the test of a political system is whether or not it improves the lives of the majority of people”. At the end of the day, that's the real test of a political system.
Here, my message, to it very simply, you'll find a lot of the data, I'm going to use a lot of data, in case you're wondering where to get the data, the data is taken from chapter seven of my book “Has China Won?” And I’m happy to announce it has also been published in Chinese now. The main case I’m going to make to you is that the country that claims, clearly, that it is a mother ship of democracy, is the United States of America. And, I’ll say, for many decades, the United States was, in many ways, the gold standard for democracy in many areas. But in recent times, clearly, the United States is not functioning as a democracy. It is functioning as a plutocracy.
I can tell you that many Americans themselves feel that something has gone wrong with the democracy. And, by the way, just yesterday, literally 24 hours ago, the Harvard University Kennedy School Institute of Politics came out with a new poll showing that 52%, believe that the country's democracy is either in trouble or a failed democracy, and only 7% said that democracy in the United States is healthy. And, I would say, this poll from the Harvard Kennedy Institute of Politics is a very significant warning sign, because quite often, young people can see things more clearly than old people like me can. You know the old fable, of the child who could see that the emperor was wearing no clothes, that's an old western fable, Aesop’s fable. So, in the same way, you also find that the young people can see through very clearly what has fundamentally gone wrong in the American political system.
The key point I want to make is that while you may think that this may be just a temporary downturn in the performance of American democracy, it actually may be much more serious, and my case is that it has become a structural problem. What I say is, “under the surface guise of a functioning democracy, with all the rituals of voting, America has become a society run by moneyed aristocracy that uses its money to make major political and social decisions”. This is a difference between a democracy and a plutocracy. A democracy is a government of the people, by the people, for the people. A plutocracy is a government of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%.
And what is actually quite shocking about this development in the United States is that America’s greatest political philosopher in the last 100 years, he's a man I actually met in Harvard, his name is John Rawls, I wrote my master's thesis, explaining the concepts of freedom and equality in the writing of John Rawls. And John Rawls said this, in a very prescient fashion 50 years ago, he said that “the liberties protected by the principle of participation, lose much of their value whenever those who have greater private means are permitted to use their advantages to control the course of public debate”. So, if money can control public debate, then money will take over the decision making.
And unfortunately, the one decision that the supreme court made, that was disastrous, was the decision that is known as Citizens United versus Federal Election Commission in 2010. That decision basically said, this is a rough summary, that money has the right to free speech. So, just as human beings have the right to free speech, money has the right to free speech, and the result of that is that that was the critical step towards creating a plutocracy instead of a democracy. Martin Wolf from the “Financial Times” said, “the Supreme Court’s perverse 2010 Citizens United decision held that companies are persons and money is speech. This has proved a big step on the journey of the US towards becoming a plutocracy”.
If you have any doubts that money has taken charge of the political system, there are very serious academic studies that document how money has taken charge. In particular, I cite two Princeton University professors, Martin Guilens and Benjamin Page, they have very careful measurements about whose preferences are reflected in the decisions made by the US congress and US public institutions. And their conclusions, which they said, “the preferences of economic elites have far more independent impact on policy change, than the preferences of average citizens do”. And the conclusion, therefore, is this, “in the United States, our findings indicate the majority does not rule”. Maybe I should repeat that. “In the United States, our findings indicate the majority does not rule, at least not in the causal sense of actually determining policy outcomes”. They say that while you have all the processes of democracy, like regular elections, freedom of speech and association, all that makes no difference. At the end of the day, the decision do not reflect the wishes of the majority, and therefore, that is a plutocracy and not a democracy.
Going back to the point that Mr. Lee Kuan Yew made, that you cited, he said that, “the test of a system is whether or not it improves the livelihood of the majority of people”. But that hasn’t happened.
And another writer, Anand Giridharadas, a former New York Times columnist, said, and these are his figures, the average pretax income of the top 10% of Americans has doubled since 1980, that of the top 1% has tripled, and that of the top 0.001% has risen more than 7 fold. And at the same time, the bottom 50% have not seen any improvement in their standard of living. So if you go by what Mr. Lee Kuan Yew said, if the test of a democracy is whether or not it improve the livelihood of the majority of the people, there is overwhelming data that shows that the livelihood of more than 50 % of Americans have stagnated over 30 years, and the top 0.001% have taken everything. The net result of this, therefore, is that the United States, which used to be, I would argue, a strong. healthy, functioning democracy has functionally become a plutocracy. And really, we need to understand what has gone wrong there, because if this is going to be the model for the rest of the world, then we have a problem. I want to thank you very much for inviting me to make this contribution.
(翻译:李泽西、许馨匀)
本文系观察者网独家稿件,文章内容纯属作者个人观点,不代表平台观点,未经授权,不得转载,否则将追究法律责任。关注观察者网微信guanchacn,每日阅读趣味文章。
标签 民主危机-
本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑: 由冠群 
-
国际空间站又遇新威胁,紧急变轨躲避美国火箭碎片
2021-12-06 16:32 航空航天 -
赵立坚:不以为耻反以为荣
2021-12-06 16:24 中日关系 -
首场竞选集会,“法版特朗普”遇袭
2021-12-06 16:21 法国见闻 -
中老铁路首列货运专列抵达昆明,满载天然橡胶等
2021-12-06 16:03 一带一路 -
美用工荒持续,圣诞老人工资涨15%但还缺3000人
2021-12-06 15:54 美国一梦 -
一艘中国货轮在俄罗斯库页岛海域搁浅,船员暂无伤亡
2021-12-06 15:03 -
普京时隔3年访印,双方将首次举行2+2会晤
2021-12-06 14:34 -
美太空军“要钱暗号”:中国2030年要超过美国啦
2021-12-06 14:12 中美关系 -
昂山素季和温敏均被判处4年监禁
2021-12-06 14:10 缅甸局势 -
美媒炒作:中国将在美东海岸对面建军事基地
2021-12-06 14:07 -
乌干达总统:西方企业没远见,中国瞄准机会
2021-12-06 13:42 非洲之窗 -
卢卡申科签总统令:优先加强白中合作,落实“一带一路”
2021-12-06 11:53 -
抵制北京冬奥?德奥委会主席怒批候任外长:不要太过分
2021-12-06 10:26 德意志 -
英外相不装了:咱不用对殖民史感到愧疚
2021-12-06 09:44 不列颠 -
美国新增确诊41264例、死亡183例
2021-12-06 07:35 美国一梦 -
王毅:反对把西方“民主”标准强加于人
2021-12-06 07:26 中国外交 -
美国日均新增再破10万例,奥密克戎“虎视眈眈”
2021-12-05 22:30 新冠肺炎抗疫战 -
我使馆:华人在上世纪初就来定居,功绩应被所罗门人民铭记
2021-12-05 20:44 中国外交 -
印军射杀至少12名平民,军方:情报错误致误伤
2021-12-05 19:47 印度惊奇 -
普京拜登定于7日视频会晤,将讨论乌克兰局势等
2021-12-05 17:53 俄罗斯之声
相关推荐 -
他张嘴就来:不寻求与中国贸易战,但中企作弊… 评论 120乌克兰暗示西方“双标”,美欧:你们和以色列不一样 评论 367美国对中国造船业等发起301调查,商务部:一错再错 评论 440“令人鼓舞!无法想象没有中国的全球供应链” 评论 48德最大反对党也来华:德国危机,中国紧盯 评论 187最新闻 Hot
-
美国胁迫下,阿斯麦CEO最新涉华表态
-
与中国建交后首次!美澳紧盯这国选举
-
G7财长:将协调对伊、对俄制裁
-
他张嘴就来:不寻求与中国贸易战,但中企作弊…
-
美菲军演将击沉“中国造”军舰,菲军方声称“不是故意为之”
-
声称选举不自由,美国将恢复对委内瑞拉制裁
-
“以色列曾考虑周一反击伊朗,但最终决定推迟”
-
威胁上了?法财长:欧洲要对中国“露出獠牙”
-
事关TikTok,他竟想借着援乌援以法案“夹带私货”
-
乌克兰暗示西方“双标”,美欧:你们和以色列不一样
-
他离任前“反华之心不死”,扬言全面封锁制裁“援俄中企”
-
美国对中国造船业等发起301调查,商务部:一错再错
-
德英当面劝说克制,内塔尼亚胡:我们将自己决定
-
“令人鼓舞!无法想象没有中国的全球供应链”
-
这是迪拜…
-
“最后一刻,乌克兰突然退出”
-