-
周波:如果中美竞争是一场“新冷战”,欧洲才是主战场
英文原文:
French president Charles de Gaulle once said: “It will not be any European statesman who will unite Europe: Europe will be united by the Chinese.” He must be turning in his grave to see how Europe has been divided, rather than united, by the Chinese.
On a recent joint visit to China to show European solidarity, president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen and French President Emmanuel Macron, however, seemed poles apart. Von der Leyen criticised China’s friendship with Russia and spoke of a need to “de-risk”. Macron said Europe must avoid being drawn into any US-China conflict over Taiwan, and has maintained that Europe should not become a “vassal”.
Europe’s strategic autonomy lies in how it deals with major powers such as the United States, Russia and China independently, but it won’t happen any time soon. With war raging in Ukraine, Europe is more reliant than ever on America. In reaction to Macron’s comments, US Senator Marco Rubio said if Europe would not pick a side between the US and China over Taiwan, then maybe the US should focus on Taiwan and let the Europeans handle Ukraine themselves.
However long the Ukraine war lasts, the likely outcome is an armistice. Last year, Russia declared the incorporation of Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. Although Russia can hardly have full control of the four provinces, it must have some gains to justify its war. That leaves Ukraine with a nightmare scenario: no Nato membership and the loss of further territory after Crimea.
Europe cannot possibly grow its strategic autonomy while in the shadow of Nato, the transatlantic security alliance. Macron famously said Nato was “brain-dead”. Supporters can point to Finland’s entry to say Nato is becoming more popular, but Macron is still right. The war brilliantly illustrates Nato’s Catch-22: no matter how strong, Nato does not dare launch an attack on the world’s largest nuclear-armed state, but neither can it claim defence – 31 countries ganging up on one looks ludicrous.
Nato may survive and even celebrate its centenary, but so what if it merely becomes irrelevant? The Anglo-Portuguese Alliance is the world’s oldest, at over 600 years, but how many people know, and who really cares?
Much has been said about the advent of another cold war. If the only consensus between Beijing and Washington is to avoid a hot war, then we probably are in a new cold war. What makes this one different, though, is that this is a competition between two giants, rather than two blocs.
The competition, then, is first to see who makes fewer mistakes and, then, who can win over the third parties. The battleground won’t be in the Global South, where the US has very much lost to China, especially in Africa and Latin America. It won’t be in the Indo-Pacific either, where few countries want to take sides. It will be in Europe, where the US has most of its allies and where China is the largest trading partner.
Gradually, the transatlantic alliance will relax. Even if America’s decline is gradual, it cannot afford a global military presence. It will have to retreat from around the world, including from the Middle East and Europe, to focus on the Indo-Pacific, where the US sees China as a long-term threat. Successive US presidents, Republican and Democrat alike, have asked Europeans to take greater ownership of their security. In other words, Europe has to have strategic autonomy, even if it doesn’t want to.
That Europe takes China as a partner, competitor and systemic rival at the same time says more about Europe’s confusion about China, than what China really is. This year has seen a blitz of visits to Beijing by European leaders. The reason is simple: Europe cannot afford to have sour relations with Beijing and Moscow at the same time. The longer the war, the more Europe will look to China for mediation.
Presumably, Europe will deal with China and the US with pragmatism, that is, making choices on issues case by case, rather than picking sides.
There is only one scenario that could change Europe-China relations fundamentally – a war in the Taiwan Strait. But there is no evidence that Taiwan is bound to become the next Ukraine.
Although most Taiwanese wish to maintain the status quo, the process of cross-strait integration has begun. An estimated 1.2 million Taiwanese, or 5 per cent of Taiwan’s population, lived and worked on the mainland in 2020. So long as mainland China continues to open up, this process won’t stop.
Beijing’s strategic patience is also reflected in China’s second military exercise around the island. Even if Beijing clearly took Tsai Ing-wen’s meeting with US House Speaker Kevin McCarthy in California as a provocation, its response was much more measured than when his predecessor, Nancy Pelosi, visited Taiwan, in that it simulated attacks without the live firing of weapons.
Beijing knows more than anyone that peaceful reunification is in its best interests, and more importantly, that it is still possible.
The potent legacy of de Gaulle is that every French politician after him seems to be a Gaullist. But if de Gaulle was speaking for France, Macron was trying to speak on behalf of Europe. Time will prove that he is more prescient than von der Leyen. In a 21st-century multipolar world, a Europe that stands as a pole would look its strongest.
本文系观察者网独家稿件,文章内容纯属作者个人观点,不代表平台观点,未经授权,不得转载,否则将追究法律责任。关注观察者网微信guanchacn,每日阅读趣味文章。
-
本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑: 戴苏越 
-
秦刚:中方主张中欧关系不针对、不依附、也不受制于第三方
2023-05-11 07:32 中法关系 -
巴以局势紧张升级,中国驻以使馆紧急提醒
2023-05-11 07:27 巴以恩仇录 -
朔尔茨:愿就乌克兰危机等重大问题同中方加强沟通
2023-05-10 22:46 中国外交 -
秦刚:战后国际秩序必须维护、中国国家统一必须实现
2023-05-10 22:20 中国外交 -
尹锡悦执政一周年拍纪录片花了4千万韩元?韩网民怒了
2023-05-10 22:10 -
为求经费,美国副防长又“碰瓷”中国
2023-05-10 22:09 美国政治 -
埃尔多安大选前为公务员涨薪45%,影响70万人
2023-05-10 21:00 -
意总理称可能考虑退出“一带一路”?外交部回应
2023-05-10 20:57 一带一路 -
叙利亚总统收到沙特国王邀请,将参加阿盟峰会
2023-05-10 20:47 -
俄罗斯审议废除《欧洲常规武装力量条约》
2023-05-10 20:04 俄罗斯之声 -
美媒图解中国铁路遍布东盟:“将中国置于区域贸易核心地带”
2023-05-10 19:56 -
胜利日阅兵“低调但讲究”,普京讲话释放什么信号?
2023-05-10 17:59 观察者头条 -
阿临时政府对打击“东伊运”承诺是否利于获国际认可?中方回应
2023-05-10 17:34 阿富汗 -
东盟峰会前,菲总统呼吁各方尽快敲定“南海行为准则”
2023-05-10 16:38 南海局势 -
为抗衡中国影响力,美国又有新动作
2023-05-10 16:31 -
“日本为什么不直接向国内排放核污水?”
2023-05-10 16:16 日本 -
“美元正面临真正的危险”
2023-05-10 16:06 美国经济 -
中方回应:一个中国原则不可阻挡
2023-05-10 16:02 中美关系 -
汪文斌:谁在利用基因从事不可告人的活动,大家心如明镜
2023-05-10 15:57 -
美国博物馆“裸展”商代青铜鸮尊,被游客撞坏了
2023-05-10 15:47 考古
相关推荐 -
国家安全部:稀土变“西土”?妄想! 评论 132国务院:逐步取消各地新能源汽车购买限制 评论 155“拜登还要看到多少焦尸,才到他‘红线’?” 评论 121“美国只顾着对华制裁,可能重蹈清朝覆辙” 评论 255最新闻 Hot
-
“若重返白宫,特朗普正考虑让马斯克担任政策顾问”
-
要对中国电动汽车下手?欧盟推迟了
-
以战时内阁成员:内塔尼亚胡已彻底失败,应在年底前举行选举
-
在以军炮弹上写了这句话,黑利惹众怒
-
四国元首同期访华,阿拉伯国家为何如此重视这一论坛?
-
“如果这意味着开放,而不是为了选举,古巴政府不会阻碍”
-
“太过依赖印度,尼泊尔努力40年无果,中国出手了”
-
“荷兰特朗普”提名新首相获通过:“无党派”的前情报头子
-
“我不认为美国财长会是个文盲…”
-
“我说了一千遍了,西方没长耳朵?”
-
“美国只顾着对华制裁,可能重蹈清朝覆辙”
-
“我第一次在欧盟会议上真正看到讨论制裁以色列”
-
以色列拟认定这个联合国机构为恐怖组织
-
大众高管:等着中方反制吧
-
安徽:彻查,严肃追责问责
-
全世界都愤怒了,但美国却说:未过红线
-