-
周波:对“四个警察”来说,印度洋和太平洋太大了
(原文如下)
Why US-led, anti-China Quad is either meaningless or doomed to failure
The largest question hovering over the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, or Quad, grouping of the United States, Japan, Australia and India is what exactly it is.
Initiated in 2007 by Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, the forum did little to coordinate policy in the Indo-Pacific. This is why when US President Joe Biden hosted the first virtual Quad summit on March 12 with Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, it caught the world’s attention, especially the announcement of a “Quad Vaccine Partnership” that committed to providing at least 1 billion doses of vaccine to Southeast Asia.
However, this summit is not necessarily a springboard to success. As if to indicate that it is a ‘concert of democracy’, the Quad’s catchphrase is a “free and open Indo-Pacific”. But when has the Indo-Pacific not been open and free? Security challenges, including piracy, terrorism, territorial claims, illegal fishing and criminal trafficking, are not new, and they are not exclusive to the Indo-Pacific.
Since 2008, the most outstanding problem affecting the security of the international sea lanes in the region has been piracy in the waters off the Horn of Africa. This problem has been largely resolved thanks to the joint efforts of some 25 international navies in line with UN Security Council mandates.
The Quad is really about China, even if China was not explicitly mentioned in the summit. The problem is that if the Quad is against China, the glue that binds the group is not strong enough. If it is not, then there is no need to establish the Quad at all.
Let us start with the worst possible scenario. Should a conflict arise between China and the US in the South China Sea or the Taiwan Strait, Japan and Australia would struggle to figure out how to fulfil their obligations as American allies without burning their own hands.
India would not give a damn about taking America’s side at all. The likelihood of India getting involved militarily in a China-US conflict in China’s periphery is as remote as the US’ military involvement in a China-India conflict along the Sino-Indian border.
Admittedly, the brawl resulting in the deaths of 20 Indian soldiers and four Chinese soldiers in the Galwan Valley last June was shocking, to the extent that Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said India’s trust in China was “profoundly disturbed”.
But the fact the troops chose to use fists and wooden clubs to fight in a stone-age manner showed they knew they should not shoot at each other under any circumstances.
Since the Chinese and Indian troops have withdrawn and a de facto buffer zone was established, the situation has de-escalated. Hopefully, the deadly brawl will provide useful lessons for the two governments in finding new ways to enhance confidence-building, such as setting up hotlines.
India is central to the Quad as the other three countries are already allies. Although India is not happy with the presence of China’s navy in the Indian Ocean, which it considers its own backyard, there is no evidence of conflicting interests.
The Chinese navy only has a base in Djibouti, and Chinese flotillas only conduct counter-piracy operations. In May 2011, the Chinese and Indian navies cooperated with Nato in rescuing the Chinese merchant ship Full City that had been hijacked by Somalian pirates.
If India chooses to embrace the United States, it will invite two consequences it cannot afford. First, it risks India’s strategic autonomy and manoeuvrability among major powers. This matters as India is one of the founders of the non-aligned movement.
Second, it risks a decline in India-Russia relations. India is the world’s second-biggest arms importer with Russia as its top supplier, garnering half of the Indian market. Any move by New Delhi towards Washington will only alarm Moscow, one of Washington’s strategic competitors alongside Beijing.
However the Quad might evolve, it is unlikely to become an “Asian Nato” targeting China. This is not because all parties have disclaimed any defence role for the grouping at one point or another, but rather that each Quad member has a strong economic relationship with China.
China is one of the US’ top trading partners and the largest trading partner of Japan, Australia and India. None of them would wish to sacrifice their own economic ties with China, let alone for the sake of the other three countries.
Likewise, it is doubtful “Quad Plus” countries such as South Korea, Vietnam and New Zealand would wish to join the Quad as full members for fear of Beijing seeing them as members of an “anti-China club”. They might still participate in a few multilateral naval exercises such as the Malabar Exercise in the future, though.
What holds Quad members together will not be the much-touted partnership on climate change and the Covid-19 pandemic. These are global challenges that can only be addressed through a collective global response. If the Quad’s future is maritime security cooperation, as most people would agree, there is also a limit as to what it can achieve.
The Indian and Pacific Oceans are too vast for four policemen. Besides, cooperation on addressing maritime issues such as terrorism, human trafficking, humanitarian aid and disaster relief is the purview of regional institutions such as the Asean Regional Forum and Asean Defence Ministers Meeting Plus. Those groupings already include major regional players such as China, the US, Japan, Australia and India.
Unless the Quad takes common strategic issues in the region as driving forces and proves itself to be inclusive rather than exclusive, the future of the small group is not bright. It can survive, but it will not thrive.
本文系观察者网独家稿件,文章内容纯属作者个人观点,不代表平台观点,未经授权,不得转载,否则将追究法律责任。关注观察者网微信guanchacn,每日阅读趣味文章。
-
本文仅代表作者个人观点。
- 责任编辑: 小婷 
-
美国新增确诊61317例、死亡756例
2021-04-04 07:25 新冠肺炎抗疫战 -
“中国只用一代人时间,把贫穷国家变成美国对手”
2021-04-03 23:47 美国政治 -
他加戏:我帮忙建的中澳关系,得断
2021-04-03 21:08 -
英国接种阿斯利康疫苗后30人出现血凝块,其中7人死亡
2021-04-03 18:02 -
俄罗斯警告:若美国出兵,将采取一切必要措施
2021-04-03 16:40 乌克兰之殇 -
人前喊着要与中国竞争,人后却…
2021-04-03 16:38 美国一梦 -
韩国同日与中美分别会谈,韩媒:“走钢丝外交”能否成功?
2021-04-03 16:26 三八线之南 -
阿根廷总统新冠病毒检测呈阳性
2021-04-03 15:44 新冠肺炎抗疫战 -
“英美将海洋法视为打击中国的工具,但他们遵守了吗?”
2021-04-03 14:28 美国一梦 -
纽约警方:袭击亚裔的嫌疑人普遍有精神病史
2021-04-03 13:55 美国一梦 -
特朗普制裁国际刑事法院人员,拜登政府解除了
2021-04-03 11:33 美国政治 -
韩76岁男子接种辉瑞疫苗后死亡
2021-04-03 11:17 新冠肺炎抗疫战 -
为重启伊核协议,美伊同意间接会谈
2021-04-03 10:07 伊朗局势 -
美国新增确诊70117例、死亡937例
2021-04-03 08:18 新冠肺炎抗疫战 -
王毅与四国外长讨论缅甸局势,强调避免继续发生平民伤亡
2021-04-03 07:50 缅甸局势 -
菲律宾外长洛钦:中菲友谊牢不可破
2021-04-03 07:30 中国外交 -
美国国会大厦发生袭警 警察一死一伤
2021-04-03 07:28 美国一梦 -
加拿大运动员入籍中国,有人焦虑了
2021-04-02 22:49 -
碰瓷“中国基建狂魔”?美国刚从D班升C班
2021-04-02 21:58 美国一梦
相关推荐 -
乌克兰暗示西方“双标”,美欧:你们和以色列不一样 评论 240美国对中国造船业等发起301调查,商务部:一错再错 评论 410“令人鼓舞!无法想象没有中国的全球供应链” 评论 42德最大反对党也来华:德国危机,中国紧盯 评论 184“我们坚持自由贸易和竞争,没感到中国车企的威胁” 评论 152最新闻 Hot
-
德最大反对党也来华:德国危机,中国紧盯
-
“我们坚持自由贸易和竞争,没感到中国车企的威胁”
-
阿联酋AI公司获微软15亿美元投资,“条件是剔除华为”
-
“出狱软禁”,缅甸军政府透露昂山素季最新情况
-
安理会投票前一天,美国代表对巴勒斯坦入联申请“泼冷水”
-
以方公开现场画面,曾称“美国军官就坐在控制室里”
-
美国民居遭“太空打击”,NASA承认:空间站太空垃圾
-
美商涌入广交会:看到了耶伦表态,但商人做生意,政客搞政治
-
美国务院:布林肯访华想聊中俄关系
-
美西方再挥舞制裁大棒,还要中国“协助帮忙”?
-
朔尔茨访华,背后有这些现象
-
“G7要喊出西方声音,但没中国不行,他们跟俄罗斯关系好”
-
耶伦称“我相信这能帮助中国”,中方驳斥
-
“中国确实可以发挥重要作用”
-
以色列要报复?伊朗回怼:那我们将动用从未用过的武器
-
“减少对华依赖”,欧洲时隔逾10年重启镁矿开采
-